Built to be checked.
Fast research is easy. Research you can repeat in a boardroom is the hard part. Here is exactly how a briefing earns its claims.
AI can produce a confident answer in seconds. Confidence is cheap. Every Yudame briefing runs through a pipeline that treats each claim as unproven until it survives cross-checking, an adversarial pass, and a set of publication gates. When a report fails a gate, it goes back for rewriting. What reaches your podcast app is the version that passed.
Six passes between a topic and your ears.
Each pass has one job. Together they separate what the evidence supports from what merely sounds right.
Research runs on independent engines
Your topic goes to multiple deep-research providers, each with its own sources and its own blind spots. At least three must return real findings before the pipeline moves forward.
Every claim is cross-checked
Findings are compared across all providers. Claims confirmed by two or more sources, claims resting on a single source, and claims where sources disagree are each marked as such.
Weak claims face a refutation pass
Load-bearing claims that rest on one source, or sit in conflict, get an adversarial pass whose only job is to knock them down. Refuted claims are dropped. Weakened claims are reframed as counterpoints, with the doubt kept visible.
The written report is re-verified
After the narrative is written, a separate critic re-reads each load-bearing claim against the research evidence alone, never against the report's own prose. Unsupported statements, invented statistics, and anything contradicting facts you gave us send the report back for rewriting.
Numbers get their own audit
Every cited figure is re-checked for currency, unit, and denominator against its source. A dollar figure quoted in the wrong currency, or a ratio with a shifted baseline, is a failure, and the report goes back.
No dangling citations, ever
A deterministic check resolves every citation in the report to a declared source. This one involves no judgment call at all: a citation that points nowhere is a hard stop.
The path a briefing travels.
A report that fails a gate loops back for another research or writing round. Publication is the exit, never the default.
Your facts outrank the internet.
Sources carry different weight, and the ordering is strict.
Ground truth: what you tell us
Facts and documents you provide sit at the top of the hierarchy. When web research disagrees with your ground truth, the conflict resolves in your favor, and a report claim that contradicts your facts cannot publish.
The open web, verified
General research findings rank below your facts and earn their place through corroboration. A claim standing on a single web source is labeled that way in the underlying research, never silently promoted.
Rigor you can listen to on a run.
All of this runs so you can press play with confidence. One plan, everything included.